The small body of the deceased was laid flat on the cold autopsy table.
Mu Mianâs mood was heavier than usual, as this was the youngest human body she had ever dissected, and it was also a child with Down syndrome.
Mu Mian did not start by dissecting the head of the deceased. Instead, she first cut open the chest and abdominal cavities, removing the internal organs. She began by examining the heart, scrutinizing it carefully.
Chen Xue asked curiously, âMu Mian, why didnât you start with the head?â
âBecause I need to determine the cause of death first.â
âThe skull has been cut open, so shouldnât we first confirm if the cause of death was mechanical injury? Itâs possible the victim died from massive blood loss or brain tissue damage.â
Mu Mian emphasized again, âThe wound on the scalp shows no signs of vital reaction. This means the scalp was cut after death. Additionally, the lividity on the body is quite pronounced. If the cause of death were massive blood loss, the lividity would be lighter. The deceased was a child with Down syndrome, who often suffer from various congenital diseases, the most common being congenital heart disease.â
Lividity is formed by the deposition of red blood cells after death. If the deceased had lost too much blood, resulting in a significant loss of red blood cells, the lividity would appear lighter.
Chen Xue said, âDo you suspect the child died suddenly from an illness?â
âItâs possible.â
Mu Mian noticed that the deceasedâs ventricles were thicker than those of an average person, and one of the heart valves had an abnormal structure.
Further pathological testing of the heart would be needed to confirm whether there were any issues. Mu Mian sent the heart to a testing facility for pathological analysis.
Pathological testing is a tedious process and takes a considerable amount of time. This was why Mu Mian had chosen to dissect the internal organs first.
âFinally, itâs time to examine the brain,â Mu Mian said excitedly.
She carefully cut open the sutures on the head. The stitches were made with ordinary black thread, not medical-grade, but the knotting and sewing technique suggested the person who had stitched it had some clinical experience.
After removing the sutures, Mu Mian carefully peeled back the scalp, separating the subcutaneous tissue to reveal the skull.
The skull had already been sawed open with an electric saw. Mu Mian lifted the cranial bone and discovered that only half of the brain tissue remained inside the cranial cavity.
The perpetrator had severed the corpus callosum, which connects the two hemispheres of the brain, splitting the brain into two parts. They had then taken the left hemisphere of the deceasedâs brain.
Chen Xue was stunned.
âThe perpetrator actually took the brain tissue, and only the left hemisphere? Why would someone take the brain of a deceased child?â Chen Xue exclaimed in shock.
Mu Mian replied, âIt could be for research purposes. They could make brain slices to observe pathological changes.â
âThen why only take half?â
âMaybe âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââthe left hemisphere had some research value,â Mu Mian said as she removed the remaining half of the brain tissue, now deeply intrigued by it.
Chen Xue looked at the brain and said, âThis reminds me of a famous medical experimentâthe split-brain experiment. Sperry, in an attempt to treat epilepsy, severed the corpus callosum of a patient. While the patientâs seizures stopped, they lost the ability to control their behavior. This patient became known as the âsplit-brain person.â Could the perpetrator be replicating this experiment?â
Sperryâs split-brain experiment demonstrated that the human brain is divided into two hemispheres: the left hemisphere receives sensory information from the right side of the body and controls movements on the right side, while the right hemisphere handles sensory information from the left side and controls movements on the left. Severing the connection between the two hemispheres renders a person unable to control their behavior.
âBut what value would replicating this experiment have?â Mu Mian wondered. âThe division of labor between the brainâs hemispheres has already been thoroughly studied. Moreover, the perpetrator removed the left hemisphere after the victimâs death. They wouldnât be able to observe any behavioral changes in a dead person.â
âTrue. Taking the brain of a dead person would only be useful for pathological research,â Chen Xue agreed.
Mu Mian thought for a moment and said, âThereâs another possibility: the perpetrator didnât want us to know what pathological changes had occurred in the left hemisphere, so they took it.â
âThen why didnât they destroy the entire body? The childâs body was so small; they could have disposed of it in many other ways,â Chen Xue analyzed.
Mu Mian looked at the cranial cavity, equally puzzled about the perpetratorâs motives.
She sent the right hemisphere of the brain for pathological testing as well, to determine if there were any abnormalities in the brain tissue.
**Case Analysis Meeting**
The pathological test results were not yet available, so Mu Mian simply reported the preliminary findings from the autopsy.
âInitial findings suggest two possible causes of death: first, sudden death due to illness. The child may have had congenital heart disease and died from a heart attack. Second, the brain may have developed a pathological condition that damaged vital centers. The pathological report isnât ready yet, so I canât determine the exact cause of death at this time.â
Mu Mian continued, âThe perpetrator sawed open the skull and removed the left hemisphere of the brain. Both the suturing and the craniotomy were performed with precision, suggesting the perpetrator has extensive clinical experience. In fact, they might even be a neurosurgeon.â
Mu Mian displayed a photo of the cranial cavity on the screen.
Everyone stared in disbelief at the image of the skull, now missing half of its brain.n/o/vel/b//in dot c//om
Zhang asked, âWhy did the perpetrator only take half of the brain? Wouldnât it have been easier to take the whole brain?â
Mu Mian replied, âI find it strange too. The perpetratorâs actions are contradictory.â
âCould they be mentally unstable?â
Lin Sen said, âIf thatâs the case, they might strike again.â
Wang reported the forensic findings: âIn the flowerbed, we found two sets of footprints. One belonged to the sanitation worker who reported the case, and the other was a size 41. The shoe print pattern doesnât match any known brand. The childâs clothing only had the fingerprints of the person who reported the case.â
Fang Rui displayed a photo on the screen. In the soil of the flowerbed, the perpetrator had written a symbol, âá,â in blood. The handwriting was neat, and the symbol was slightly larger than a thumb.
âTests confirmed that the blood used to write the symbol belonged to the victim,â Chen Xue reported.
The team searched online for the symbol but found no specific explanation. It seemed to be a symbol created by the perpetrator, possibly meaningless.